Writing Echoes

Delijah's Writing Blog

Transmedia StoryTelling course – Review

I’ve recently taken I’ve recently taken a Course called `Transmedia Storytelling’ through the platform FutureLearn and I’ve been thinking for a while that I wanted to write a review. The problem was that I was not sure what to say about the course. I mean. It was not bad, and it did follow what it said it would do in the introduction page. And yet… and yet it was lacking something, and I am not sure of what. I think – after quite a bit of wondering – that it lacked the practical approach, or the case studies, which were only mentioned in the last week, where ‘successful example of transmedia’ were mentioned.

The course, by Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU) , provided quite a lot of information and definitions, but I’d say it was a bit locked – it barely spoke about anything that was not cinema-based, with some mentions of video games, and books only were brought up to speak about adaptations. And yes, while the Avengers have been a massive success, they haven’t been the first example of transmedia in the world. it surprised me that even if the course was taught by a South Korean institution there was no mention to the platform jump between cartoon – real life drama – films – comic – novels etc that part of the Asian creations seem to take quite easily.

The most interesting part was the differentiation between the idea of adapting a concept to different media and creating a world that can tell different stories in different media. This is an intriguing concept.

On the other hand, it focused a lot in the ‘consumer as creator’ angle, which I am not sure I understood. I am guessing it referred to videogames, especially building ones. There was a non-committal silence regarding fanfiction, too.

The course gave me the idea, however, that the creator was relegated to someone in second place, and I don’t really agree with that. Gee, I wonder why.

All in all, I took the whole course, although I won’t buy the certificate because it’s quite expensive… But it made me want to compose music for the story I’m working on… and I have discovered music is hard…

NaNoWriMo Sponsor Offer Review: Fastpencil Paperback Proofcopy

Everyone is entitled to mistakes, and in my opinion, FastPencil made one when they launched the NaNoWriMo 2015 Sponsorship. My initial idea had been reviewing it as “run you fools”, but I have decided that such a thing was not fair to them. While other times I have screencapped the process, I lost my patience with this, so, it did not happen this time.

The offer (which at the time of speaking can be located at https://nanowrimo.fastpencil.com/nanowrimo2015) shown in the image promises a free proof copy and a 70% off in a distribution package for winners. Nothing that we haven’t seen before, but always nice to try a new service.

1. Create the project. Fair enough.
2. Adding titles, descriptors, reviews and such
3. Listing authors and contributors
4. Choose a category for your book

Of course, this is my own opinion here, but before spending time filling forms, I want to see whether you take my file or not, just in case what happened happens. And what happened? That FastPencil expects you to upload a pdf/x file, i.e., one created with Adobe Professional or the pdf export tool from Microsoft Word in Mac. Both are professional tools towards the higher end of the spectrum. Most NaNo Writers won’t be using either, as the tendency is among the amateur pool. And the professionals usually have their own distribution channels by the time they are so.

Hack: you can use the Adobe Professional trial, active for 30 days in order to go around this problem. It will work for one time, but okay. You can walk around the problem (for me, it meant reformatting the whole $\LaTeX$ file in OpenOffice, export as pdf and convert to pdf/x in Adobe Pro). Not convinced by the result, I decided to try their manual formatting.

Importing the rtf files screwed the formatting up, so I found myself having to work on the html front to adapt what I wanted to one of the default styles they have. This is not “friendly” nor easy for most people, FastPencil (I show you html though, because is how I worked. You could work with rich text too).

• Item: out of the six offered styles, 4 are completely unprofessional, and look tremendously ugly. But that is personal opinion, you might disagree with me.
• Item: You must have chapters. They won’t take a one-shot, and the chapters must be sequential. While they do have a “short story” style, for some reason this separates the title on one page and the story on the next.
• Item: Dragging and rearranging “chapters” is a good idea, but the different types of “chapters” are not clear. What’s the difference between a “front matter” and a “back matter”? Why does something called “blank” allow you to insert code there, shows you results and just prints a blank page? If you let me insert code in the blanks, I will assume that you’ll allow me a no-number page that I can use as separator. I’ll obviously assume wrong.
• Item: The preview takes me through the whole compilation project, and I have to download a file every time. This would not be so annoying if the process worked every time and not just 50% of the times. And I like seeing what I’m doing. Shame on me, that I need to check that everything is according to what I design.
• Item: Erasing blocks will take me back to the project page so I have to start the process over again.

Finally! The project is “finished”. By now I’ve dropped two designs, my lovely $\LaTeX$-pdf, a short story, the kanji separators that I made for between-stories and my hope of getting a non-link-blue table of contents and spent about 7 hours (in different days) in the whole project since I started the FastPencil part.

Now it’s time to go through steps 2 – 5 that we did for the pdf, as this is a “new” project, render the pdf (and here apparently people other than me have been stuck for hours) and if you want a physical copy agree that it’s going to be \$9.99, just because + an extra which will depend on how many pages you’ve got (\$0.04 per page). This is for both “marketplace” and “private copy”. The “publishing package” is over \$200, and you have to “commit to buy” now (you would be able to change your mind later, but yes…).

Then you make covers, you’ll have to upload your png of pdf according to the sizing, but the spine is automatic. Make sure you have a look before you choose your cover fonts, you don’t want them to clash too much (again, people have complained about long rendering times. I did not have that issue).

You check the preview, you approve it and you get to ordering (and yet again, people have been complaining about issues here). You introduce the code and the \$9.99 + pages. In my case, 60 pages added up to \$13.61, plus \$1.50 handling, a grand total of \$15.11. I type in the NaNoWriMo discount code and… \$13.61 go away. The handling stays. “Free copy”? Nope. Not if I have to pay \$1.50. But okay. I’ve gotten this far, I can spare \$1.50. I click order.

Shipping charges: \$85.53 from USA to Spain. Screw you, FastPencil.

For the record, though, I did contact them and asked if there was a chance for a more reasonable shipping method, but as I started looking into the forums and Twitter, I saw that it was the tendency. Other charges I’ve come across: \$40 to Canada, \$144 to Sweden, \$76 to the UK and my favourite:

Obviously, FastPencil did not think this through. They did not take into account international shipping at all. they did not realise that their target was not a pool of professionals. I am a bit savvy with computers, and it took forever to get everything to work. FastPencil claims that they offer “publishing made simple”. If that is simple, give me complex code, anytime.

No, I did not order the book. No, I’m not planning to. Hell, I only have three more words to say about FastPencil: “Run you fools”. And now you know the whole story why: Everyone is entitled to mistakes, and giving FastPencil a chance was mine.

Edit: I thought that the review would end here, but no! There’s still more to it. As I was not going to use their service, and concerned with privacy, I decided to delete my content and my trial experiments from the site and their servers. I was able to erase the “project” but I was stuck with the “publication”. This means I was able to eliminate the editable part, but not the generated pdf.

Thus I took to support and found the page to the right (now updated after this Twitter exchange), printed and thumbnailed for convenience. After looking up and down for the “delete” button I contacted support and reached out via Twitter. Apparently, no, you can’t erase your own content on your own, which for me is a bit unsettling. Once I provided the url and title, the “project” does no longer show. However, this process makes me feel uneasy about the whole content management idea.

Of course, the easy version of this would have been to just edit the project blank, but I did not know at the time that I was going to be unable to delete the generated pdfs. Erasing content when the file was an uploaded pdf was easier, as the only thing I had to do was removing the upload.

Unlike the email regarding shipping, which I sent on January 27th, this was dealt with swiftly. I think it was more efficient as I sent a support request from the page, logged in, rather than an email. Maybe public mention on Twitter helped, I don’t know.

Long story short: Erasing your content is not completely in your hands. The updated page does not even mention the possibility of erasing a project yourself.

NaNoWriMo Sponsor Offer Review: Lulu.com Hardcover

The other day I talked about Blurb’s BookWright Program as one of NaNoWriMo reward system. Today I bring you the review of Lulu.com’s offer for every participant:

Stand out with a professionally printed FREE HARDCOVER book.

Lulu.com is so thrilled to support all of the Wrimos again this year! We’re the only self-publishing company in the world that allows you to create hardcover, softcover, and eBooks, and distribute them globally.

This year we are excited to be bringing back our FREE HARDCOVER offering. Once you have finished uploading your manuscript and formatting your book cover […] (you can enter the code) for your free First Edition Hardcover! Start your book today!

Participants will also be entered to win free eBook conversions. We will be drawing one lucky name each week for 12 weeks beginning December 1, 2014.

The post did not specify date, which was however locked in another one:

The fine print: This offer must be redeemed by February 28th, 2015, is good for a one-time use, and does not include the cost of shipping.

Then in the Lulu.com forums, the date was changed to December 31st, 2014. Repeated tries to contact them were not successful, so I rushed through the process in order to get it done on time, it was a surely interesting New Year’s Eve! Let me tell you, I am not happy how the company has not answered anyone – not me, not anyone else, as people continue asking questions about it today. I have not heard of anyone getting the free eBook conversion.

Keep in mind that since the whole thing was so rushed in the end that I did not take screencaps to the process, and the ones shared here are from a recreation.

Formatting process

Content: Lulu takes mainly PDF files, so that was easy for me as I have my $\LaTeX$ PDF templates tailored to my liking and the offer’s requirements. Truth be told, Lulu has an enormous amount of options that are great to get for free.

LaTeX formatting ♥

Creating the project: After choosing that you want to make a print book, the first step is creating the title, filling up the fields and choosing the options. The professional hardcover includes a dust jacket, which tends to look really cool. Once the project is created, the system allows you to upload the PDF (it needs embedded fonts, if you are using a regular word processor, but I never had trouble with that). The PDF is processed and converted to a PDF-print ready file. During this process requirements such as margins, image resolution, and fonts are checked.

Start creating the project

Title, author and distribution

Book options

The cover Wizard: After the PDF is ready, you can move on to the Cover maker. The online cover maker allows you to choose a design – my usual is free-style. You know the cover and backcover sides, of course, and the smaller images have a label which tells you which size they need to be. The inner cover font is chosen for you, and has a limited character number. The dust jacket spine cannot be personalised further than font and colour, but the default fonts are neutral, so it is quite nice. The process is in general quite easy. I haven’t tried the advanced cover making though.

Inner spine options

Cover Wizard, photograph-only layout

Handy Size Notes

Add pictures by dragging them into the cover

Ordering process

As soon as you finish the process, it appears ready for ordering. You can make it available to the Lulu marketplace, too. The code is applied on checkout, without any further fuss (Note: for the code to work, you need to be on Lulu.com, and not the local Lulu if it exits).

Finished project details

Book page

Shopping Cart

The hardcover

Good and sharp quality printing for the interior, and high quality paper. However, the dust jacket did not turn out too well this time (the Axis 95/11 one came out much better). However, I am not sure whether the problems with the folding are due to the book being too thin, matte printing, or just a different kind of paper or processing for it. I think the thickness issue was important.

The inner covers feel awesome though (^_^).

Front cover

Inner content

Inner cover and dustjacket lapels

The TL;DR

Nice product, not too reliable company. I mean, as a sponsor who make an offer, they have every right to change the conditions of such offer. However, the way the whole date thing has been handled (read: not) would make it harsh for me to trust Lulu.com as a publishing company.

NaNoWriMo Sponsor Offer Review: Blurb’s BookWright Program, softcover and ebook

As part of the NaNo winning ‘prices’, some companies offer to print you one of your books for free (although you have to pay for shipping). This is totally clickbait, I know, but what the hell, I like it. This year I plan to review the process on the three companies that do it – CreateSpace, Lulu and Blurb.

The catch for Blurb’s offer is that you need to use their program, BookWright in order to get the following, as stated in the NaNoWriMo Winners’ page:

• One softcover copy of your novel in our 6×9 inch Trade format, up to 480 pages with Economy black and white printing (offer expires January 31, 2015). How do you do it? Just use Blurb BookWright™, our free layout software, to design your book. Try out our new novel templates to get a head start.
• Free conversion of your book from BookWright to a reflowable eBook for Apple® iPad® (EPUB3 format) or Amazon Kindle® (KF8 format).
• Entry into a draw where you could win free editorial services from a member of Blurb’s Dream Team network of publishing professionals.

Formatting process

I had been editing a couple of the short yakuza-centric stories with the idea of making a compilation of them, and this was my chance. The code was good until January 31st and I had two stories out of the four I wanted ready, and one halfway. Ready, for me, means proofread (at least by me, I do my best), formatted and converted into $\LaTeX$ format.

Here comes my first surprise. BookWright does not take pdf, at all. It wants rtf formats. It wants me to format my document in a text processor and feed the formatted document to the program. The automatic index does not stay when I do the conversion, and neither can I do changing headers – those which are different for each chapter – I need to go with a static one, and aligning that is a nightmare so I give it up.

After fighting with the layout for ages – and discovering that the best way to “undo” is to close the program without saving your changes, I get a new surprise – there is no way to generate an index unless it is… the old way. Aka doing it by hand. Needless to say, I was less than impressed – I mean, even Microsoft Word can do your tables of content automatically, even if it blows sometimes. That should be something basic, imo. And by hand, I mean going to the page, writing it down, and making the dotted line and trying hard as hell to align it.

BookWright complained a lot about fonts, as apparently you need to license fonts for eBook creating? Not going to criticise that, although I was peeved at first at how much it complained about good ol’ Times New Roman. I decided to go with Arial in the end because it is always a safe option.

I finally managed to format everything, although it took a ridiculous amount of time. I had to make sure that all the chapters started on an odd page, make the index, and resize titles, things that my $\LaTeX$ coding does for me, usually. I should have left a blank page before setting the title page, though, but I only realised that when I got the printed copy. We’ll get to that.

The next step was setting up the cover. I had the 6 x 9” cover in high resolution template, so that was no problem, and I managed to do both the back and front covers without trouble. The spine, however, gave me some trouble as I did not manage to find any indications on what size to measure. After a few educated guesses, I make the cover for the softcover book and the eBook (here I messed up a bit with proportions, my own fault).

BookWright has three main working focuses: covers, pages (main text) and background (where you set the layout, headers, page numbers, etc). Aside from the issues mentioned above, the program in general did not come through as too user-friendly for me, it was very slow and stopped responding at times. It would not adapt to my screen either. I did double-check that some of the things I wanted to do in the forums, and saw that they could not be done, but not all of them – it might be possible that you can do some of them and I just did not find the way.

Choosing / Creating the project

Formatting the text (1)

Formatting the text (2)

Background and layout

Designing the softcover

Ordering process

The uploading and ordering is easy enough, as is the ordering and paying process, which is done through the web. You obviously need an account with Blurb, though. You upload from BookWright and the wizard takes you through the correct steps. The code was easy to use, and the shipping was reasonable. What amazed me was the price they had for you to download the extra pdf.

Ordering and paying

End of the ordering process

The eBook

Looks neat. The white thing on the cover is my fault, I did not realise that I needed to resize the cover a bit. Regarding the inside, the index is not linked, which is annoying. The header is added automatically, which is nice. The reflowing one/two pages works pretty cool too (shown on my Kindle for iPad).

eBook Cover

eBook Index

eBook – one page

eBook – Two pages

The softcover

The outside covers are very, very cool, they are not too shiny even if you are – as I am – a matte fan. The inside printing is well-defined and clear, however I find the paper a bit too thin, a lot can be read from the backpage. The gluing feels extremely good. However, not convinced by how the book came out a bit wavy.

One image is worth a thousand words so:

Softcover front cover

Softcover inner pages

Softcover titlepage

Softcover: wavy side

The TL;DR

I would not recommend them as a launching program, too much hassle. I am not sure if their pro package is better as I have not tried it though. The InDesign plug might be a solution, but as I mentioned, I use $\LaTeX$ and I am pretty happy with it, so BookWright is not my best option.

I’m doing the whole formatting again with a friend soon, so I’ll let you know if the second time feels better.
ETA: Nope. Still a mess.

Introduction to Forensic Science MOOC

After the Historical Fiction MOOC, I snooped around for some other courses, and stumbled into FutureLearn, who offered an Introduction to Forensic Science , from the University of Strathclyde, in Glasgow.

I was quite thrilled to find this as you might remember Victim #14 happens in Glasgow, and has a police plot. I thought that it would be interesting to have an insider on how Forensic Science works in the UK.

The course ran over six weeks, covering:

• Principles and practice of Crime Scene Investigation
• Fingerprints
• Blood Pattern Analysis and DNA
• Footwear and toolmark impression evidence
• Drugs of abuse
• Forensic Science as the “Silent Witness”

The MOOC covered some theory along with a “case study” to illustrate the lessons, where a culprit needed to be identified. It had videos and discussions, and some fun activities to do.

The course is not bad in itself, and I can deal with the Scottish accent pretty well. However, by the fourth week I decided that reading the video transcripts was much more productive than listening to the videos, except in the case study where the images were better to play along.

Procedure-wise it was interesting, as it covers a few aspect that investigation in the UK differs from what we’re used to see in US series and films, and I want to adapt a few things in Victim #14. Science-wise was not too bad, either.

All in all it was a good entertaining for six weeks, a couple of hours a week. The course promised an on-screen participation statement which you can see to the right (click for bigger) and which was rather disappointing. It cannot be used to prove anything, as it has no name on it anywhere. When you print it, it looks even worse, as those are just formatted letters. It does not bother me that much as I am doing it for fun but… really? That is ugly. And useless. And just tries to force into buying a printed certificate…

And don’t be impressed by those 100%s, the tests were easy and could be taken with the notes anyway.

Plagues, Witches, and War: The Worlds of Historical Fiction (3)

Well, the Plagues, Witches, and War: The Worlds of Historical Fiction course is officially over. In all honesty, I started the course aiming to find some tools to work on a story regarding the Keichō Embassy from Japan to the Vatican, lead by Hasekura Tsunenaga between 1613 and 1620.

I am not left with an overall impression of the course that is positive. As you might remember, I have been a bit peeved with the whole deadline fumbling, and everyone going on their high horses about it. Well, the last deadlines also got juggled, and jumped a whole week backwards, so in the end basically every deadline got moved, some with louder announcements than others. I won’t go into that again, but changing requirements is not something that is going to give a course a good reputation (and the course organisers have been complaining about the “bad rep” of MOOCs).

Opinion on classmates aside, my general impression of the course is a big… ‘so what?’ I mean, what is the whole buzz about historical fiction? That it requires research, and sometimes a lot of it? That is true, if you want accuracy, but you need to research with whichever genre you are writing. Even when planning a fantasy world you need to decide on your laws of physics. I am making a big effort to get my hands on every factual yakuza publication out there, for example (which apparently makes me a huge geek somehow).

It is not my intention to put down historical fiction as a lesser genre, but… research-wise it does not really feel a particularly different genre. If you want to portray anything with accuracy, you need to do your research. Using real people as characters might be the tricky part, but that is a choice the author makes. Each writing path has its own difficulties, I’d say, and historical fiction is not an exception in any way. You can also quite easily ‘ignore’ the research part and be deliberately ‘imprecise’, just giving clues about where and when you are – that’s the easy way (I am guilty of doing that before, I confess… and I am sort of doing that with the location of Turn of the Page right now).

I did decide to give Dickens a second chance and I would have bought one of the guest author’s books, if some idiot had not given away the ending on the forums. Also, I had thought about sharing the assignment ‘essay’ I wrote, but… you know, I kinda lost interest.

This is not me wanting to complain about something that I got for free, but not convinced. I did not find the course serious enough somehow. Wobbly deadlines are a sign of bad organisation and it is very hard for me to learn anything if it is not organised. That might be why right now I don’t feel like I learnt anything particular from Plagues, Witches, and War: The Worlds of Historical Fiction that can at the moment help me improve my writing.

Plagues, Witches, and War: The Worlds of Historical Fiction (2)

This post was going to wait until the course was finished, and should have been a tadbit different, but something happened today that had made me a bit miffed.

As I mentioned in the previous post, the Plagues, Witches, and War: The Worlds of Historical Fiction course has three grading points:

• Three quizzes
• Five “guest author” questions, one for each of them
• An essay, which had to:
1. identify a primary source (an original document / object / place…)
2. add a link to it or an explanation of why a link was not included (i.e. you used something not on the Internet)
3. be over 10 sentences
4. be handed in at a fixed point in time, for which you had a countdown (total time circa 20 days)

After that you check points 1-3 on five essays (“peer evaluation”), and that’s all folks.

Except now the deadline has been extended. It has been pointed out that I am a horrible person for not wanting Philippines people to get their certificate of completion. But let be honest here, while I admit that a natural disaster sucks and that people who have been through the typhoon need a break and leeway, these are other reasons I have found:

• It was Thanksgiving. Who puts a deadline in the middle of a holiday??
• Messed up time zones
• Assumed the time was 23:59 and not 00:00
• Had it done, but I wanted to send it last minute
• Signed up for the course after the deadline was passed
• Mistook the deadline for the deadline of another course / issue

I believe that generally extending a deadline is a mistake. It lowers the quality of the course, as the requirements become more on the lax side. There are ways to deal with individual cases, such as those affected by a natural disaster, and can be done. It requires more effort, yes, but can be done. Furthermore, for a free course, reputation is everything, and now a precedent has been set – just whine, even if your reasons are “I can’t read a clock”, and the deadline will be moved. Because the instructor wrote that “it had been poor planning on his part to set the deadline in the middle of a holiday” anyway, so it was his fault, right?

This also pushes forward the clock for assessing your peers. I am done, but many people are not. Now those people are falling behind with their schedules, blocked for 48 more hours (which is time to “post if you’re done”. Hah. Ten sentences and we have a list of archives right there. It IS doable in an hour. Not that I believe many people would do it anyway, start from scratch when they have already missed the deadline once). So now we either have less time for the peer evaluation, or the deadline for that will also be extended and the results will be in later and people will complain that they’ll have less time for the quizzes and… It could go on and on forever.

All in all, I think that extending the deadline was a poor idea. When you want something free to have quality you need to put effort on reputation, and this, silly thing as it might sound to you, is unfair. It reduces the quality of any certificate of completion that can be obtained, because the grading criteria are not rigorous at all, they are accommodating and bendable beyond the human condition of wanting to give a hand to someone who has found themselves in the middle of a natural disaster.

Because of Thanksgiving or misreading the clock? That is where quality dies down.

Just to be very clear here: Giving Philippine students a second chance, I agree with. Giving everyone a second chance, just because, I disagree with. I believe there could have been another way to deal with the situation.

Research Book Review: Shinto: The Kami Way

Title: Shinto: The Kami Way
Author: Sokyo Ono
Publisher: Charles E. Tuttle Company
Pages: 116
Year: 1962
ISBN: 0-8048-0525-3

Contents

1. The Kami Way: Introduction, mythology, Kami, Scriptures, Types of Shinto, Organisation
2. Shrines: Shrines and Shrine Paraphernalia , Precincts, Architecture, Priests and Shrine Functionaries, Parishes and Parishioners
3. Worship and festivals: Worship, Four elements of worrship, Worship in the home, Shrine Worship, Festivals
4. Political and Social characteristics: Government Policy, the Arts, Economic Life, Relation with other Religions, Everyday Customs
5. Some spiritual characteristics: Transmission of the Faith, Shrines and nature; World, Man, Salvation and Death, Universality of Shinto

I stumbled upon this book quite on accident, and it was not what I was expecting, then again, I am not sure what I was expecting anyway. For the first four chapters of the book Dr. Ono sounds like an anthropologist, describing aseptically, maybe even a bit sarcastically the beliefs of Shinto, while on the last part, he sounds like a fanboy. Neither of them seems very appropriate as he belongs to the Association of Shinto Shrines.

The conclusion one draws from the book is “I was supposed to explain Shinto but as nobody can understand Shinto, I’m going to skip that and describe what you can see of it.” At some points the book is a bit contradictory, classifying Shinto first as a religion, then not, then yes again. Towards the end, Dr. Ono states that Westerners can’t understand Shinto anyway, but it is a universal faith.

Now, I understand that this book was written in the 60s by someone whose first language was not English, so some expressions may be a bit phased out, but I did find some typos that made me chuckle. While interesting, it is a bit of a slow read, that touches many topics but does not delve into any.

All in all, it’s not a must-read, but a nice-to-have-read if you’re a little bit of a geek, I guess.

Research Book Review: Butterflies of the Night

Title: BUTTERFILES OF THE NIGHT – Mama-sans, Geisha, Strippers and the Japanese Men They Serve
Author: Lisa Louis
Publisher: Tengu Books
Pages: 214
ISBN: 0-8348-0249-X

Contents:

1. Job Hunting in the Water Trade
2. A High-Class Affair
3. The Geisha World
4. A Special Kind of Sleaze
5. Customers
6. Outsiders: Token Whites
7. Women at a Discount: Japayuki-san
8. The gangster element
9. Mizu Shobai, Past and Future

Butterflies of the Night deals with the issue of night entertainment in Japan, mainly hostesses (club-based companions that mostly chat, flirt, and pour drinks), mama-san (female club managers), prostitutes (funnily enough not in the title, is a “bad” word I guess) and geisha. It dedicates a few pages to the customer angle, but not enough to warrant the presence in the title, I’d say. The woman-based entertainment for men is called “water trade” (mizu shobai) in Japan, and there are many theories of why – it is not important for this post, anyway.

I have mixed feelings about the book. While I found it quite interesting, it took me ages to read, and it did not give me as much new information as I was hoping for. The style is plain, and the formatting is lacking at times, which I think put me off reading somehow. Regarding the “lack of information”, I need to note down that the book was written in 1992, probably being one of the first resources on the topic.

I am not sure whether this is a pro or a con, but it has to be said that the book is completely subjective – it is built from the author’s personal experience and an extensive interviewing job. This makes it interesting as it is a first-hand source of information. Unfortunately, it made me miss some hardcore objective data – which however would be terribly outdated anyway after 20 years. An interviewed Yakuza estimates that the gangsters have hold on about 20% tops of the sex trade in Japan, while recently the Polaris Project has been giving much higher numbers. I can’t tell whether that is subjectivity or twenty years of evolution.

In the Internet era, the book is not a must have, as most of the information it provides can be found online (see an example here), as well as sprinkled in other resources such as Tokyo Vice or Yakuza , both much more up-to-date. While it is a good topic-focussed book built on first-hand impressions that gives a glimpse into the softer side of the mizu shobai‘s world, it lacks an exhaustive study of the hardcore sex-trafficking and slavery that goes is part of the prostitution rings. Quite obviously, I doubt sex traders would sit down for a cozy interview.

Summing up: not a bad book on first hand softcore experiences, with a few interesting anecdotes. A nice add to an specialized library, but not indispensable.

An Evening with Ray Bradbury (2001)

Ray Douglas Bradbury (August 22, 1920 – June 5, 2012) was an American fantasy, science fiction, horror and mystery fiction writer. Best known for his dystopian novel Fahrenheit 451 (1953) and for the science fiction and horror stories gathered together as The Martian Chronicles (1950) and The Illustrated Man (1951)

Wikipedia

I found this doing some link-jumping. You can agree more or less with him, but I loved quite a few of his points. These are the top ones, just because:

• Fire friends who don’t believe in you “any one who does not have faith in you and your future… to hell with them”
• Have fun writing! Writing is not a serious business よ
• It is good to admire other writers, but don’t try to be them
• Don’t think commercially, write for yourself

Good talk is good. Enjoy it if you can spare the hour’s time.